In this Journal of Indexes (JOI) interview (download below), two of the world's smartest investors weigh in on the strategies that have made Dimensional Fund Advisors one of the most successful fund firms in the world. Better known as finance professors, Eugene Fama and Ken French helped design DFA's stock-selection and fund-management techniques. In this interview, Fama and French revisit their original conclusions, poke fun at the arrivistes who have since claimed to have discovered their ideas, and, once again, show why traditional stock-picking is almost always for the birds.
Notable points:
- Fama and French now disagree about the cause of the "value effect"--the phenomenon in which value stocks have outperformed growth stocks over the long term (for more on the value effect, see this post). French no longer believes that this outperformance represents "distress risk" and, instead, thinks there is some "mispricing" involved (investors underestimating the prospects for value stocks and overestimating them for growth stocks). Fama, ever the efficient market man, begs to differ.
- Both men are shocked that commentators believe that today's hot product--"fundamental indexing"--is actually something new. The academic literature, they point out (and DFA), has described the strategy for 15 years. The advantage of "fundamental indexing" is merely that it captures the value effect. As French puts it: "It's not even another way [of doing this.] It's the same way. I have a friend who calls [fundamental indexing] value investing for clients who don't understand ratios."
- On the "dividend-weighting" strategy used by Jeremy Siegel and WisdomTree: This, too, is nothing new. Dividends are just another way of sorting stocks to capture the value premium. Unfortunately, using dividends as the value screening metric is inferior to using book-to-market ratios. How do Fama and French know this? Because they've tested all the value metrics.
- Fama still thinks the market is efficient, but French now concedes that some people can probably beat it. Returns are so random, however, that he just doesn't have enough information to figure out who they are (implication: neither do the rest of us.)
- On whether the value/growth mean-reversions can be timed (Specifically, as I asked in this post: Can investors use the ratio between value and growth to predict the performance of each asset class?) According to French, there's no evidence that this works.
- On ETFs: Great tools, as long as they're cheap and passive.
- On behavioral finance: Investors make the mistake of assuming that, now that they know some of the mistakes investors make, they won't make those mistakes. Unfortunately, they'll probably just make others.
Well this is interesting. Two of the world's smartest investors shared their views about the traditional stock-picking.
It also came as a surprise when I learned that fundamental indexing and dividend-weighting are not new.
This is a great post and I will be reading more post in your site.
More Power!
Posted by: stock trading | September 04, 2009 at 02:03 AM
Nice article.
=====================
John Assam
Posted by: foreclosed home auctions | October 31, 2009 at 02:20 AM
Hello
Interesting post about Fama and French Dish, Diss, and Disagree
I have enjoyed following your blog entries.
thanks
Posted by: Buy Viagra | December 08, 2009 at 12:05 PM
You have a very good blog that the main thing a lot of interesting and useful!
Posted by: Compra Propecia | January 27, 2010 at 01:54 AM
Hi! I read your post and found it really interesting.
Posted by: Online pharmacy | March 08, 2010 at 02:13 PM
Better known as finance professors, Eugene Fama and Ken French helped design DFA's stock-selection and fund-management techniques. In this interview, Fama and French revisit their original conclusions, poke fun at the arrivistes who have since claimed to have discovered their ideas, and, once again, show why traditional stock-picking is almost always for the birds.
Posted by: generic viagra online | May 04, 2010 at 08:01 AM
To say, all value indexing is the same is a bit like saying all cars are the same. Is a model T the same as a Jaguar? Science and engineering are different disciplines. Though Rob Arnott did not invent Value, I'd rather own his funds than DFAs.
Posted by: Jean Lesperance | May 12, 2010 at 10:57 PM
These arguments all make sense. It is funny how the older systems are the best ones.
Posted by: stock picking | July 04, 2010 at 02:21 PM
You know your info, thats for sure. I agree with what you said. I found similar thoughts http://www.rapidpig.com and reviews but your site covers this better. Thanks
Posted by: Hugo | July 21, 2010 at 11:20 AM
Better known as finance professors, Eugene Fama and Ken French helped design DFA's stock-selection and fund-management techniques. In this interview, Fama and French revisit their original conclusions, poke fun at the arrivistes who have since claimed to have discovered their ideas, and, once again, show why traditional stock-picking is almost always for the birds.
Posted by: NFL Jerseys | July 27, 2010 at 10:47 PM
Perhaps this is one of the most interesting blogs that I have ever seen. Interesting article, Funny comment. Keep it up!
Posted by: cheap nfl jerseys | August 08, 2010 at 07:52 AM
Everything matters! That's a perfect phrase for the reality I tried to get at: "mattering" (alias meaning) somehow winning out even when things seem random. Or when they grow out of mistakes (or out of some small, distant move or misstep). I just want to emphasize the good work on this blog, has excellent views and a clear vision of what you are looking for
Posted by: viagra online | August 17, 2010 at 01:16 PM
These arguments all make sense. It is funny how the older systems are the best ones.
Posted by: wholesale nfl jerseys | August 20, 2010 at 12:04 AM
These arguments all make sense. It is funny how the older systems are the best ones.
Posted by: order allegra | October 11, 2010 at 10:06 AM
Thank you for new issue, I really like this website
my friend told me that this blog is competitive. i will read more.
Thanks for sharing your article. I really enjoyed it.
Posted by: wholesale NFL jerseys | October 13, 2010 at 04:34 AM
i love it
Posted by: sex offender search | October 25, 2010 at 05:34 PM
Most be great to be an inventor, and specially of this successful fund firms in the world. Most of the people think that these guys are very smart but sometimes they are just normal persons that wants to be someone.
Posted by: Kamagra | November 05, 2010 at 01:53 PM
That is an awfully astounding column you've posted.Thanks a lot for that a fantastically amazing post!
Baseball Hats
Posted by: Baseball Hats | December 01, 2010 at 07:39 PM
Great Blog! Thanks so much for this useful information.
I hope you will contribute a lot to all your readers and gain more valuable information. Thanks!
Posted by: belstaff bag 556 | December 07, 2010 at 10:49 PM
Maybe, change is a good new life.
Posted by: ghd straighteners | December 08, 2010 at 04:48 AM
Great Blog! Thanks so much for this useful information.
I hope you will c ontribute a lot to all your readers and gain more valuable information. Thanks!
Posted by: escort | December 11, 2010 at 05:24 PM
Great Blog! Trhanks so much for this useful information.
I hope you wrill c ontribute a lot to all your readers and gain more valuable information. Thanks!
Posted by: toptan mallar | December 11, 2010 at 05:27 PM
Great Blog! Trhanks so much for this useful information.
I hope you wrill c ontribute a lot txo all your readers and gain more valuable information. Thanks!
Posted by: görüntülü chat | December 11, 2010 at 05:28 PM
Merry Christmas! Thank you to tell us more interesting information. So nice sharing.I’m great to read it .
Posted by: Titleist AP2 | December 24, 2010 at 09:36 PM
hanks so much for this useful information.I hope you will c ontribute a lot to all your readers and gain more valuable information. Thanks!
Posted by: Titanium Jewelry | January 03, 2011 at 10:25 PM