Jeremy Siegel's latest column in Yahoo Finance responds to John Hussman and others, who argue that Siegel's irrational bullishness is setting him up to be come a modern-day Irving Fisher. Siegel's response: The critics are wrong, profit margins are fine, valuations should be higher, and stocks are going up.
Siegel's main arguments are these:
- The hand-wringing about "record-high profit margins soon reverting to means" is misplaced because 1) a greater percentage of U.S. corporate profits are coming from international operations, which aren't affected by U.S. GDP, and 2) a greater percentage of overall U.S. profits are now captured by public U.S. companies instead of private ones.
- Innovations in the financial system, namely lower trading costs and smarter central banks, have reduced the equity risk premium. Thus, stocks should now trade at an average P/E of about 20-times, instead of the long-term average of about 14-times.
Siegel, in other words, believes that "it's different this time." And that's reasonable--because sometimes it is different this time (the most salient example being a permanent change in the relationship between bond yields and dividend yields after the U.S. went off the gold standard--a change that cost many "prudent" investors to miss decades of gains). Of course, more often than not, it's NOT different this time, and those who argue that it is end up with egg on their faces (believe me--I know).
I'll wait for Hussman, Grantham, Smithers, DeLong and others to respond to Siegel's arguments before taking a strong stand here. I will simply suggest that the big lesson from most major bull markets is this: anytime someone argues that "it's different this time," the burden of proof ought to be on them (as opposed to on bears who appear to be "wrong" because the market keeps going up). With this in mind, I'd like to see more data from Siegal backing up his profits argument--a chart showing the percentage of U.S. profits generated from international operations over time, for example, as well as a chart of global profits relative to global GDP (are profit margins at record highs globally, as well?).
The "risk premium" argument obviously won't be settled until after the fact, but in my mind there's an easy counter to that one: Today's risk premium is low because stocks haven't been that risky recently--even with the crash of 2001-2002, global equities are sharply higher than they were 10 years ago. Go through a couple of decades of stagnation, meanwhile, like the periods that followed market highs in 1929 and 1966, and investors won't give a damn about low transaction costs or more enlightened central banks. Instead, because stocks will seem like the worst investment idea anyone ever thought of, investors will once again demand a huge equity risk premium.
Great post. Thanks for clarifying that article -- I wasn't clear on a few of Siegel's points.
So, U.S. GDP only measures the production within the United States itself?
I guess I had assumed that U.S. GDP included anything produced by U.S. corporations regardless of geographic location.
If it's only U.S. production though, then it does seem like we need a different way of measuring profit margins (regardless of whether he's right at this point in time).
Is there any measure of total U.S. corporate production that can be compared apples-to-apples with U.S. profits?
Posted by: mla | May 07, 2007 at 02:57 PM
Siegel was bullish during the whole 2000-02 decline. He's an idot.
Posted by: a | June 15, 2007 at 09:19 PM
Instead, because stocks will seem like the worst investment idea anyone ever thought of, investors will once again demand a huge equity risk premium.
Posted by: mr big dicks hot chicks | May 19, 2010 at 01:25 PM
O ve web sitenizi ziyaret etmek burada mükemmel sonrası zevk benim için büyük bir zevktir. Onları çok seviyorum. Ben hepsini mantıklı ve çok yararlı olduğu gibi, bu makaleleri çok dikkat hissediyorum. Çok teşekkürler paylaşım için.wc3r5
Posted by: alüminyum doğrama | March 13, 2011 at 05:13 PM
Remember to create your own statement which your mind.
Posted by: arginine | April 04, 2011 at 10:18 AM
So fun article is! I agree the idea!
Posted by: Coach Factory Outlet | June 28, 2011 at 02:32 AM
history is full of punctuation mark, the history behind the scenes are all exclamation mark.
Posted by: Nike women shox | July 08, 2011 at 09:37 PM
history is full of punctuation mark, the history behind the scenes are all exclamation mark. ds
Posted by: escort siteleri | July 09, 2011 at 12:29 PM
Following my analysis, millions of people in the world get the credit loans from different creditors. So, there's a good chance to receive a small business loan in every country.
Posted by: PatriciaCasey | July 26, 2011 at 09:06 AM
why doesnt work.. ?? well, its work, but, its very slow.. can u help me ??
Posted by: escort bayan | August 07, 2011 at 11:03 AM
Is there any measure of total U.S. corporate production that can be compared apples-to-apples with U.S. profits?
Posted by: escort bayan | August 08, 2011 at 02:38 PM
I cannot really leave a more constructive comment
Posted by: escort bayan ankara | August 12, 2011 at 04:57 AM
great post. thank you. thank you. thanks for sharing. very nice..
Posted by: bayan escort | August 17, 2011 at 11:11 AM
Go through a couple of decades of stagnation, meanwhile, like the periods that followed market highs in
Posted by: bullet express | September 03, 2011 at 05:25 AM
this definately made sense
Posted by: online shopping | September 14, 2011 at 08:14 PM
I cannot really leave a more constructive comment
..
Posted by: wctube | September 15, 2011 at 06:15 PM
thanks nice post,and thanks sharing!!!!
Posted by: Cheap New Era Hats | September 16, 2011 at 10:48 PM
since our GDP is going down at a record rate can you maintain these profits?
Posted by: digital cameras | September 30, 2011 at 02:43 PM
our debt to GDP will be over 100% soon. Unsustainable. Bye Bye America.
Posted by: excessive sweating | October 11, 2011 at 03:20 PM
I like this blog. It is a rich content topic. It helps me solve a lot of problems. It updates at a very fast rate, and provides for me many opportunities. I think it can help me to solve many problems, thank you
Posted by: Wholesale jerseys | November 08, 2011 at 09:02 PM
I've been following this closely, thanks for more great read!!!
Posted by: Sex Tips | November 10, 2011 at 01:02 AM
good and nice blog about investment. this is good analysis about U.S. economy .
Posted by: How to Last Longer in Bed for Men | November 13, 2011 at 03:56 PM
Standard & Poor’s roiled global equity, bond, currency and commodity markets when it sent and then corrected an erroneous message to subscribers suggesting France’s top credit rating had been downgraded.
Posted by: Web Conferencing Software | November 15, 2011 at 02:59 PM
I've been following this very closely, thanks for the great article.
Posted by: Power 4 home system | November 16, 2011 at 07:55 AM
I wonder how much of our money is being invested in China now by private intesters.
Posted by: best diet pills | November 16, 2011 at 03:42 PM